How NIL Deals Are Reshaping College Athletics

In July 2021, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) lifted its longstanding restrictions that prevented college athletes from profiting off their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL). This watershed moment marked the end of the traditional amateurism model that had governed college sports for over a century and launched a new era of athlete empowerment, commercialization, and, inevitably, controversy.

NIL deals have already made an indelible mark on collegiate athletics, influencing everything from recruitment strategies and athlete behavior to university marketing plans and legal debates. As the landscape continues to evolve, it’s clear that NIL is not just a trend—it’s a transformative force reshaping the entire ecosystem of college sports.

What Is NIL and Why Does It Matter?

The concept of NIL is simple: it allows student-athletes to earn compensation from the commercial use of their personal brand. This includes endorsements, social media promotions, autograph signings, paid appearances, and even launching their own businesses.

But NIL is more than just a financial boon—it represents a philosophical shift in how college athletes are valued. Historically, student-athletes were compensated with scholarships in exchange for playing, while the NCAA and its member institutions earned billions annually from media rights, ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships. This model was heavily criticized as exploitative, especially in high-revenue sports like football and men’s basketball.

The introduction of NIL rights changes the game by:

Empowering athletes to capitalize on their marketability
Creating new entrepreneurial and branding opportunities
Challenging the NCAA’s traditional definitions of amateurism

This change is not just about money—it’s about agency, equity, and modernization.

The Early NIL Boom

The moment the NCAA lifted restrictions, NIL deals began flooding in. Brands saw an untapped market: young athletes with large followings, regional influence, and authentic appeal. What followed was an explosion of sponsorships and monetization opportunities that showcased how diverse the NIL landscape could be.

Bryce Young (Alabama, QB)

Before he even played a full season, Bryce Young had amassed over $1 million in NIL endorsements. His deals included partnerships with Cash App and BMW of Tuscaloosa. Young’s case illustrated how elite talent in high-profile programs could instantly leverage brand value.

Hanna and Haley Cavinder

The Cavinder twins combined their basketball talent with a massive TikTok following. By blending sports and lifestyle content, they signed deals with Boost Mobile, Champs Sports, and WWE’s Next in Line (NIL) program. Their story proved that social media could be as valuable as on-court performance.

Olivia Dunne (LSU, Gymnastics)

With over 10 million followers across social platforms, Dunne has emerged as one of the top NIL earners in the country. Her brand-friendly image has led to deals with American Eagle, Vuori, and Forever 21. Dunne’s success challenges the idea that only revenue-sport athletes can thrive under NIL.

This early boom signaled something profound: the NIL revolution would be athlete-driven, platform-centric, and cross-sport inclusive.

Recruitment and Transfer Portal Impacts

A New Recruiting Battleground

Recruiting has always been competitive, but the advent of NIL added a lucrative layer to the decision-making process. Top prospects now weigh potential NIL earnings as heavily as playing time, coaching staff, or academic reputation.

Prospective athletes are asking:

“What kind of NIL deals are other athletes at this school getting?”
“Is the university located in a big media market?”
“Do local businesses support student-athletes?”

This has led to an informal “NIL ranking” of schools—those that consistently help their athletes earn substantial deals have become magnets for blue-chip recruits.

Role of NIL Collectives

One of the most controversial developments is the rise of NIL collectives. These are donor-backed organizations designed to fund and facilitate NIL opportunities for athletes. Though technically unaffiliated with athletic departments, their influence is undeniable.

Notable examples:

Texas A&M’s “The Fund” reportedly funneled millions toward NIL deals that aligned with athlete recruitment.
Tennessee’s “Spyre Sports” collective was tied to an $8 million package for a top high school quarterback.
Florida’s Gator Collective has been a vocal player in securing deals for student-athletes across sports.

While such collectives are legal under current rules, they blur the line between NIL compensation and inducement. Critics argue that these practices threaten to create a bidding war, turning recruiting into a semi-professional marketplace.

Impact on Transfer Decisions

The NCAA Transfer Portal has become even more active since NIL began. Athletes are not only seeking better athletic opportunities but also better financial ones. Some switch schools mid-career to maximize NIL earnings, with destination programs offering enhanced media exposure or richer collectives.

This newfound “free agency” is great for athlete freedom—but it’s also challenging coaches, destabilizing rosters, and raising ethical concerns.

Athlete Empowerment and Financial Literacy

The Rise of the Athlete Entrepreneur

NIL has enabled student-athletes to become their own businesses. From launching apparel lines to monetizing YouTube channels, athletes are expanding beyond sports. They are now negotiating contracts, hiring agents, and managing brand portfolios.

Examples include:

Bo Nix (Oregon QB): Signed deals with Milo’s Tea and Bojangles.
Jordan Bohannon (Iowa): Started a podcast and merchandise brand while still playing.

This shift means athletes are no longer just players; they are influencers, entrepreneurs, and mini-media companies.

Financial Literacy: The Next Big Challenge

With new income comes new responsibility. Many athletes are now navigating:

Taxation on NIL income
Contract law and endorsements
Agent negotiations and intellectual property

However, most 18-to-22-year-olds are ill-equipped for these challenges. To bridge this gap, schools are beginning to offer:

NIL education programs
Financial literacy workshops
Partnerships with third-party legal and accounting firms

Still, without standardized curriculum or federal oversight, many athletes are learning on the fly—making mistakes that could impact their future earnings or eligibility.

Gender Equity in NIL

One of the most surprising and welcome effects of NIL has been the empowerment of female athletes. Unlike traditional sports revenue models—which heavily favor men’s football and basketball—NIL rewards visibility, relatability, and engagement.

This means female athletes, particularly those active on social media, are thriving.

Case Studies:

Paige Bueckers (UConn): Despite injury setbacks, she signed with Gatorade and StockX thanks to her national profile.
Cavinder Twins: Their TikTok and Instagram appeal led to seven-figure deals despite playing in mid-major conferences.
Olivia Dunne: Her online influence has transformed her into a marketable brand far beyond gymnastics.

NIL is leveling the playing field. It gives women in sports a platform to control their narratives, monetize their talents, and break through historic financial barriers.

The Impact on Smaller Schools and Non-Revenue Sports

Uneven Playing Field?

While elite Power Five programs are flush with NIL opportunities, smaller schools face challenges:

Limited booster networks
Smaller media markets
Fewer national sponsorships

This can lead to talent concentration, as top athletes gravitate toward schools with proven NIL track records. It may widen the gap between haves and have-nots, altering the competitive balance of college athletics.

Creative NIL Strategies

But all is not lost. Athletes at smaller schools are showing resourcefulness:

Division II wrestlers offering personal coaching sessions online
Track athletes selling training guides and nutritional plans
Volleyball players collaborating with local sponsors on community events

By tapping into niche markets and local relationships, athletes from every level can carve out unique NIL paths.

Compliance and Regulation

Patchwork Policy Problems

One of the most glaring issues in the NIL era is the lack of uniform regulation. Initially, states passed individual NIL laws, and schools adopted different standards. The NCAA provided general guidance but largely left it to institutions and local governments to sort out specifics.

This led to a confusing and inconsistent landscape:

Some states banned NIL collectives, while others embraced them.
Universities interpreted “pay-for-play” rules differently.
Athletes received wildly different levels of support depending on location.

Push for Federal Regulation

Calls are mounting for a national NIL framework. Proposed federal legislation includes:

Minimum standards for NIL disclosure
Agent registration systems
Limitations on booster involvement

The goal is to create clarity, ensure fairness, and protect athletes from exploitation. However, political gridlock has delayed meaningful action, leaving schools and athletes to navigate a complex and shifting terrain.

NIL and the Future of Amateurism

The amateur model is under existential threat. College athletes now have agents, sponsorships, and business managers. Many experts believe that direct compensation from schools is the logical next step.

Key Debates:

Should athletes receive a salary? Some advocate a revenue-sharing model where players in profitable sports get a cut of TV and ticket revenue.
Healthcare and long-term care: Should schools provide extended coverage for sports-related injuries after graduation?
Unionization and collective bargaining: Athletes at USC and Dartmouth have already made moves to be recognized as employees.

These debates represent a tectonic shift in how college sports are understood—not as an extracurricular pursuit but as a labor force deserving rights and representation.

Case Study: Colorado and Shedeur Sanders

Coach Deion Sanders’ arrival at Colorado has turned the Buffaloes into a case study in NIL success. His son, Shedeur Sanders, quarterback and social media personality, is among the top NIL earners in the country.

Their strategy includes:

Strategic media appearances on ESPN, YouTube, and social media
Brand alignment with culturally relevant sponsors like Beats by Dre and Gatorade
Community branding, helping elevate the entire Colorado program

Ticket sales, enrollment applications, and merchandise revenue at Colorado have surged. It’s a powerful example of how NIL, when embraced strategically, can transform an entire athletic department.

Ethical Concerns and Criticisms

Pressure and Burnout

Athletes now balance academics, athletics, and brand responsibilities. The pressure to perform—not just on the field but on social media and in sponsorship deliverables—is intense. This can lead to burnout, anxiety, and distraction.

Exploitation Risks

With many athletes new to business dealings, the risk of exploitation is high. Unscrupulous agents, misleading contracts, and unrealistic expectations are constant threats. Schools need robust support systems to protect students.

Diminished Academic Focus

Critics argue that the focus on monetization threatens the educational mission of universities. With so much attention on NIL, will student-athletes have time—or motivation—for coursework?

The Road Ahead: Regulation, Education, and Balance

The NIL era is still young, and its long-term effects remain to be seen. What is clear is that thoughtful planning, robust support systems, and transparent regulations are essential to ensuring NIL remains a net positive for college athletics.

Recommendations:

Federal Oversight: Enact standardized NIL legislation to ensure consistency and equity.
Education First: Require financial, legal, and brand-building education for all athletes.
Athlete Wellness: Invest in mental health and time management tools.
Collective Transparency: Regulate collectives to prevent abuses and promote fairness.
Academic Reinforcement: Keep the “student” in student-athlete through curriculum support and GPA safeguards.

Conclusion

NIL is rewriting the rules of college sports. It has ushered in a new age of athlete empowerment, financial opportunity, and institutional change. Yet it has also brought challenges—ethical, logistical, and cultural—that must be addressed with urgency and care.

This is not just a story about money. It’s a story about evolution. College athletics is no longer a rigid system built on outdated ideals of amateurism. It’s a living, breathing ecosystem—and NIL is its most powerful disruptor yet.

ByJarrett Adwell

Table of Contents